Free Calculator · Flight Schools
Compare your discovery-flight conversion scenario.
Enter your own observed discovery-flight-to-enrolment rate and compare it with an illustrative 40% planning scenario. This is not an industry benchmark or forecast; the formula is visible so you can test enrolment and revenue sensitivity against your own operating data.
Cascade Air case study — 22 of 26 tracked keywords in the top 3
How we calculate this
The math is deterministic. Open the disclosure below to audit it — there are no hidden assumptions and no rounding inside the calculation. Your inputs and the illustrative 40% scenario are the only numbers in play.
current_annual_enrolments = monthly_discovery_flights × 12 × (current_conversion_percent / 100); scenario_annual_enrolments = monthly_discovery_flights × 12 × 0.40; annual_enrolment_gap = scenario_annual_enrolments − current_annual_enrolments; annual_revenue_gap = annual_enrolment_gap × average_course_revenue; six_month_revenue_gap = annual_revenue_gap / 2. The 40% figure is an illustrative planning scenario, not an industry benchmark or client result. The math runs client-side AND server-side and produces identical results — you can verify by reading lib/discovery-flight-calculator.ts in the OTGM repository.
Aircraft type, instructor capacity, regulatory environment, geography, fleet age, current marketing spend, paid-vs-organic mix, GPU utilisation, and weather-down days. All of those affect the real outcome — none are folded into the calculator. The gap above is a top-of-funnel framing exercise, not a forecast. The diagnostic Joey sends afterwards is where the real-world constraints get factored in.
It is a round illustrative input that creates a clear comparison while keeping the arithmetic easy to audit. It does not claim that 40% is typical or achievable for a particular school. Replace the comparison with your own target only after defining the cohort, time window, capacity, lead sources, and enrolment event consistently.
Frequently asked